Journal article
Byunggu Lee, Jiawei Liu, Hyesun Choung, D. McLeod
Mass Communication & Society, 2019
Mass Communication & Society, 2019
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Lee, B., Liu, J., Choung, H., & McLeod, D. (2019). Framing Risk with Numbers: The Framing Effects of Risk Assertions and Number Formats on Emotions and Risk Perceptions. Mass Communication &Amp; Society.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Lee, Byunggu, Jiawei Liu, Hyesun Choung, and D. McLeod. “Framing Risk with Numbers: The Framing Effects of Risk Assertions and Number Formats on Emotions and Risk Perceptions.” Mass Communication & Society (2019).
MLA
Click to copy
Lee, Byunggu, et al. “Framing Risk with Numbers: The Framing Effects of Risk Assertions and Number Formats on Emotions and Risk Perceptions.” Mass Communication &Amp; Society, 2019.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{byunggu2019a,
title = {Framing Risk with Numbers: The Framing Effects of Risk Assertions and Number Formats on Emotions and Risk Perceptions},
year = {2019},
journal = {Mass Communication & Society},
author = {Lee, Byunggu and Liu, Jiawei and Choung, Hyesun and McLeod, D.}
}
Abstract
This study examines how risk assertions and relevant statistics presented in different number formats interact to influence emotional and cognitive outcomes. Experimental news stories present risk assertions that highlight either safety from or vulnerability to violent crime; these assertions are accompanied by crime statistics in absolute frequency, simple fraction, or percentage format. Although it may be tempting to assume that national statistics in absolute frequency format create a greater impression due to the sheer size of the numbers, our results show that only probability formats, including simple fractions and percentages, interact with assertions to generate amplified emotions. Furthermore, we find that negative emotions play a mediating role in producing pessimistic risk assessments. Our findings reveal how people process numerical information and its impact on emotional and cognitive responses. This article also discusses the empirical and methodological implications for framing research, as well as cognitive aspects of emotional reactions and the nature of emotional effects on risk perceptions.